Skip to content

Posts from the ‘Technology’ Category

The not-so-secret trick to getting the most of any networking event

I just finished up a Google hangout (for those who don’t know: it’s the space-age version of a party chat line with video added to the audio) discussing the pending Sage Summit 2012 annual conference.

Ably led by Greg Tirico, the common message that I heard coming from the group was: be prepared. Know what you are looking to get out of the conference before you go and that will maximize the value that you receive.

It’s easy to see why being prepared is so important.

The Sage Events team has assembled a lot of activities, content filled sessions, networking opportunities and squeezed in some (a small bit) of free time so you can do some informal networking and knowledge sharing. If you don’t go in with a plan, you might find yourself like a kid in the candy store – not knowing which way to turn.

Taking that advice to heart, I have created my own Action Plan! to coordinate my activities. I have highlighted must-attend meetings and sessions in a certain color and my internal team meetings in another color and used a different color for nice, but not essential activities. This way, if I run into someone that wants to share ideas or swap stories, I can immediately see my schedule and make sure I’m not creating a conflict for myself or another pre-arranged appointment.

I am also including cell phone numbers on the Action Plan! for everyone that I’m meeting with to ensure we can text or call to connect. In previous years, I have been running late or waiting for the other party who was running late and had no way to reach out to them.

Which brings up another tip that falls under the “be prepared” bucket: load up your phone with common contacts. So many times in the past, I receive a text message saying “hey you want to meet up?” – or something similar – from an unrecognized number. This year I have done my best to pre-load all the cell numbers of common contacts so I’m not left scratching my head wondering who I’m meeting up with.

And, countering my earlier advice, my final tip that I will offer is be prepared to go off-plan. No, you don’t want to miss any of your must-do things but if, in your travels through the conference, you encounter somone interesting with a lot of great experiences, don’t be in such a rush to move along.

I personally find that it’s the chance, informal encounters that act as the glue for the entire conference and help firm up the overall value.

If you have any tips that you would like to share, please add them in the comments – people would love to see them!

I’ve got some bad news for you, sunshine

For those not in the know, the title of this post was taken from “In the Flesh” – a song on Pink Floyd’s The Wall album. The Wall resonates heavily with themes of abandonment and isolation and relates the story of a protagonist who steadily builds up a wall to hide behind in response to the negative pressures in his life.

[Here's a link to the video for those interested: WARNING FOR LANGUAGE AND THEMES THAT MAY BE OFFENSIVE TO SOME. Please don't click if you are one of those folks that get offended at such things. In fact, no one should click on it. I'm asking you not to.]

I think the themes are appropriate as the next few articles are going to focus on the Sage Transformation journey.

What exactly is the “Sage Transformation” journey?

From what I can tell (and please understand that the following is just my opinion and is not endorsed, confirmed, approved or in any other way agreed upon by anyone at Sage), at its core, the Sage Transformation journey is a plan designed to help Sage respond to the rapidly changing landscape of software publishing.

It includes many different elements including re-branding, introduction of subscription pricing, re-organization efforts, direct sales, closer interaction with end user customers, improved cross-selling, connected services and many more. We’ll cover some of these topics in the coming days but for now, let’s keep our focus on the big picture.

Read more

A no-cost way to improve customer and prospect satisfaction

Anything missing from this before I drop it in the mail?

I’m going to keep this one short and sweet.

Like a lot of folks, I’m drowning in information every day – phone calls, emails, appointments, meetings, social networks, you name it. I’m sure regular readers of this blog are in the same boat.

So …

If you email me and ask me to call you … or even if you aren’t asking me to call but there might be a chance that I will call … how freaking hard is it to include a signature line that includes the best way to contact you?

Preferrably a phone number – right there at the bottom of your email.

It could not be any simpler and it takes no time to set up.

Oh yes … I could pull up my favorite CRM system and look up your record and your phone number but why should I have to? If I’m staring at your email, it should be there.

I can’t think of a single reason why it wouldn’t be.

All businesses serve two functions: marketing and innovation (thanks to Peter Drucker for that truth).

Your email is a form of marketing and it says a lot about your character and how easy you want to make it for others to reach you and work with you.

Do yourself – and your prospects and customers – a favor. Include your damn contact information.

Drowning in email? Try this simple trick

And every day the paperboy brings more ...

If you are like me, you probably get way too many emails each day.

Some of them – from co-workers, customers, prospects, your spouse – absolutely need to be reviewed. Ok … maybe “absolutely” is the wrong word for some co-workers, customers and prospects, but you get the idea.

A lot of them, again if you are like me, are digests, summaries, information from various sources. Personally, I’m subscribed to more than a few blogs, marketing lists, LinkedIn Digests, Facebook feeds, Google Alerts, etc.

And I shouldn’t forget about the three (more?) different feeds from Wayne Schulz’s different properties!

There is no problem with all these information sources … if you are actually reading them and getting value from them.

If there are certain feeds that you read religiously and rely on as great information sources to guide your actions (think of them as a new world version of reading the daily newspaper), then these are keepers.

But what about the rest of them?

You know … the ones that just seem to pile up in your inbox and give you that twinge of “man … I really need to make time to read those”.

I was recently given a great suggestion by the one and only Ed Kless.

It was so simple, so damn stupid simple that I almost blew it off.

Here it is: Unsubscribe.

Shocking, right?

Just unsubscribe from those sources that you don’t rely on and don’t regularly read. Most of them are available at the originating  source so … let go.

So you miss a post or two? So what? Life goes on.

Besides – you are probably missing them anyway as they stack up in your inbox.

Getting rid of them will do nothing but boost your productivity and will have a side benefit of eliminating the twinges of remorse of not finding the time to read them.

You no longer need to find a lazy Saturday to go through them. Reclaim your days and peace of mind!

Some might suggest that it’s no big deal to delete them. I would suggest that attitude is much like having a newspaper delivered that you never read. Sure – you can just take them out to the recycling bin every once in awhile but, in the meantime, they pile up and clutter up your space.

Unsubscribe – save yourself the hassle.

Part of the reason why this simple suggestion took a bit longer than necessary for me to act upon was the old view that unsubscribing from a list lets them know that you are a legit email address. The concern is that will bring more and more junk to your inbox.

I think that was true years ago but with new and improved spam guards and spam laws, it is no longer true.

So … take this simple advice and free yourself by unsubscribing from those distracting sources.

PS. If you found this article of interest, please subscribe in the box on the right. :)

Does blogging pay?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/olivander/3328550233/sizes/z/in/photostream/At the end of November, I addressed some concerns that more than a few people expressed about my high level of blogging output and whether or not I still had a “real job”.

[If you don't want to read the entire original post, I summarize in the next blurb.]

I set a goal in November to blog once per business day in order to:

  1. Share valuable information.
  2. Start some conversations.
  3. Build my self-discipline.
  4. Improve my writing skills.
  5. Improving my writing speed.

So, November is long gone with December soon to follow. What, if anything, did I learn that you can use? What were the results of this grand experiment?

Overall, I’m happy to say that I met most of my goals successfully.

I produced 22 articles [full list at the bottom of the article if you care] in 22 weekdays during November which, considering Thanksgiving fell in there, means I accomplished the primary goal with room to spare.

Hopefully, the articles provided some valuable content and were of interest. Conversations were definitely started – both here and in the various LinkedIn groups, on Facebook and via Twitter where I posted links. As should be expected, some articles were of more interest than others.

I feel that I made strides in improving my self-discipline but I also know that I need to stay vigilant in this area.

Regarding my writing skills and speed, I think the excercise was a great success. I have effectively started the process of writing on auto-pilot – without needlessly editing every line as it is written.

Most of the great writers and copywriters talk about getting in this zone to produce their work effectively.

When putting words down, it’s easy to hear your internal editor over-riding your thoughts and telling you to worry about this rule or that. It’s a crappy way to write and can really kill your output.

Of course, that doesn’t mean editing is not necessary.

After I write an article, I read it once through (usually out loud) and make tweaks and word changes. Sometimes moving paragraphs around. A lot of times, I will schedule the post to publish at a  later date and then, when it publishes (I know because I subscribed to the blog by putting my email address in in the right-hand bar [ahem... hint]), I will read through it again.

And … yes … I catch errors at that time too. Sometimes it’s spellings or, much worse, I can’t understand what I meant when I wrote it. I will clean it up after I publish.

I’m ok with that.

In today’s world of widely adopted beta software and inflated need for immediacy, perfect isn’t necessarily critical.

And maybe it’s always been that way. As Voltaire famously stated a loooong time ago

The better is the enemy of the good.

Meaning: get over yourself and your need for perfection and get moving. [I struggle with this.]

One of the concerns going into the experiment was that I would run out of ideas but, surprisingly, the more I wrote, the more ideas I had of topics to cover. In fact, right now I’m sitting on a backlog of articles and content that I want to finalize and publish.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeffbelmonte/8228640/sizes/z/in/photostream/But I need to balance that desire with paying my bills. ;)

Which leads to this important realization: looking back on my original goals, none of them overtly lead to making money. So, the question raised in the post title is “does blogging pay?”.

That’s a great question … can I address it?

You bet.

The interesting thing about this experiment is that – although I had no direct goals of making money from blogging – it has led to five different Sage partners contacting me and asking if I can help them with implementing Sage CRM at their clients or internally or help them put together a proposal for a large Sage CRM customization opportunity.

While it is a great side-effect, this was a real puzzler to me as hardly any of my articles had anything to do with my company or Sage CRM. So why did they call?

Asking the partners about this, I received answers that I will sum up as follows “seeing your name on those posts reminded me that you do Sage CRM and I thought you could help us.”

So, in my case, the blogging didn’t actually “pay” directly but it did act in concert with other activities to remind people that I’m out here and might be able to help them.

That works for me.

Bottom-line: I would encourage anyone with even a passing interest to try a similar experiment. You can go my route – general purpose articles covering a few different topics – or you can go a product specific route or a vertical industry route or … really *anything* that appeals to *you*.

The key is to set your goal and stick with it. You might be surprised at the results.

If people are interested in more statistical information like traffic results, let me know and I will do a follow up article.

What’s next for me? More blogging and a new goal: buckle down and finish my book on CRM 101 [more to come on that soon].

**********************************************************************

Here is a list of articles published during the experiment sorted first by source and then chronologically.

Azamba Partners - My blog dedicated to helping other Sage resellers understand and introduce Sage CRM to their prospects and clients.

It’s not you – it’s me! (or is it?)
What is CRM?
What’s at the heart of CRM?
Find customers easily with Sage CRM marketing

Summit Diary – the blog you are currently on – your #1 source for Sage Information, Technology Tips and Random Odd Stuff (including two of my favorite topics – firm of the future and marketing).

Interested in getting more from your Sage MAS installation?
What do the new Sage pricing options mean for you?
Is your company stuck in a comfortable (maybe profitable) rut?
What exactly is cloud washing?
6 degrees of separation? Don’t make me laugh
Two good reasons why time-tracking and billing for time is stupid
What exactly is Klout?
Behind the scenes with Doug Ash and the Accpac TPAC
How Plato and Aristotle and time keeping ended in disaster
100% true story: Plato and Aristotle advocated killing the timesheet!
Twitter’s dirty little secret
I’m an experienced professional – why should I attend Sage Consulting Academy?
What exactly is Hoot Suite?
Sage Summit 2012 Save the Date announcement
Two simple rules for a better world
Does anyone really think Facebook gives a damn about their privacy?
What’s the deal with all your blogging lately? Do you have a job?
Breaking News! Decades long struggle ends with Hollywood actors winning right to hourly pay!

Dr. Sagelove: or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Re-brand

http://www.flickr.com/photos/purplemattfish/3918004964/sizes/z/in/photostream/Ok … maybe “love” is a strong word but bear with me here and then feel free to blast me in the comments if you don’t agree. Or for the more disagreeable among you, feel free to blast me even if you do agree. :)

When the re-branding was first announced, it was short on details, long on speculation, concern and fear.

The details made themselves known over the course of time which has helped squash most of the speculation but hardly any of the concern and fear.

For many, the largest concern on the table is that it’s going to create customer confusion. Personally, I don’t think this will happen but I can understand why some feel that way.

As partners, we are always discussing the products – amongst our own teams, with our clients, with other partners, with Sage, with our spouses, etc.

It’s natural that we partners think in terms of the product.

I don’t think the same is true for most customers though – at least my customers. My customers call it “the system”, “Accpac”, “CRM”, “the Sage program”, “Accpac CRM”, etc. Most of my customers don’t really care about the product name.

They just want to do their jobs.

A related concern to the customer confusion is prospect confusion. To me, this is more serious. People know “MAS”, “Accpac”, “Peachtree”, etc. and will be asking for and looking for those products for a long time. Many of these people won’t necessarily know that they are owned by Sage.

Hopefully this will get sorted out by the branding initiatives spread by Sage, the channel, the media, analysts, etc. People will start to become aware of the new names over time.

How much time this will take is open to debate. People still talk about “Great Plains” when Microsoft re-branded that four (five? six?) years ago as “Dynamics GP”.

Adding to prospect confusion though, I contend that the new product names are so generic that – assuming a prospect knows what they are supposed to be looking for (ex. Sage 100 ERP) – it is going to be difficult to find the proper information sources on the Internet.

A search for “Sage 100″ or “Sage 100 ERP” is going to return a lot of junk and we will be asking our prospects to sort through it. Search engine technology is always improving and the Sage brand pages have high authority (used to promote search results) so this might get sorted rather quickly.

So … putting aside those concerns, here are the positive take-aways from the re-branding:

  1. Sage efforts to promote the Sage brand are already working. I’ve had several different sources – prospects, referral partners, clients – mention that they heard the ads and they have had a very positive result. The marketing groups are really producing some high-quality, effective messages. This will ultimately make it easier for partners and Sage to introduce other products in the Sage family – CRM, HRMS, Payment Solutions, etc.
  2. Sage internally is beginning to focus on the Sage brand. Traditionally, as Sage has acquired companies and product lines, each group has had their own mandates, their own missions, their own messaging. I already see a shift in this – in large part because of the new unified brand message. This will make it easier for prospects, customers and partners to work with Sage in the long haul.
  3. Sage is going to be forced to deliver on the brand promises. “Forced” may be a strong word but it works. By putting themselves out there and committing to a brand and trying to drive meaning to that brand, Sage efforts will need to support that meaning or risk losing a lot. My thought is this requirement impacts every last initiative at Sage including a renewed focus on R&D to meet the brand promise. R&D has always been a soft spot in the Sage strategy and, like the other areas I’ve mentioned above, I see evidence that R&D is already turning around.

So, yes, there are still several unknowns coming with the Sage re-branding and I’m guessing that people will still be talking about “Accpac”, “MAS”, “Peachtree”, etc. for the next ten+ years despite Sage efforts.

Overall though, I think it was a bold move and a smart move on the part of the Sage team.

Right now, the software world is going through a huge shift. We need to be bold to take advantage of this shift.

The Social Business Imperative (ITA Fall Collaborative Session)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/naturesdawn/5122518384/sizes/z/in/photostream/Mark Yohai from Avectra led the discussion by starting off with the premise that the first social network was a chamber of commerce created in 1768. It’s the social collaboration that is important – not necessarily the specific tools.

Things to cover in session:

  • What is social business and why customers need it?
  • What are key requirements for social business software?
  • Vertical opportunities: associations and non-profits

Mark shared a quote from Gartner Group:

“There is one absolute about social CRM: it will be mandatory – not optional – for the majority of organizations”

He underlined this point with a slide showing the projected growth of Social for the next few years. As you might imagine, it was a set of bars growing from small to very large with a swooping arrow above the bars showing crazy fast growth.

The key to social business: people are talking. Are you listening? Engaging? Acting on these discussions?

McKinsey research has shown companies using social business solutions gain greater market share and higher margins. I believe the article in question can be found here if you are so inclined.

Mark shared some specific examples of adoption. The businesses that he spoke about were so large that, to me, they didn’t really apply to my customer base or my situation. I’m sure the IBM’s of the world are effectively doing these things but that doesn’t necessarily mean that it is going to be great for me or my clients.

In the audience, Kevin Cumley from Forepoint spoke up and made this point and tried to get clarification on how it applied to the typical firm in the room. Answered: clarification will come later.

Mark discussed common complaint: my prospects don’t use social networks. He countered this with a slide that discussed how strong and prevalent social networking is. I’m not sure that addressed the point but it’s a given that social networks are growing.

He continued on discussing public vs private networks. For public networks, he made the case:

  • Purpose – they make money
  • Branding – their brand
  • Content – they own
  • Network – they own data
  • User Experience – they control

And for private networks, you own and control all of the above.

So – do you go with only the private network? He stressed that you use both to ensure maximum value for customers and your organization.

Moving the conversation along, he asked what do we do with this social data? He discussed monitoring, tracking and even grading the particular customer or individual’s interactions with your organization. When the activity falls below a certain threshold, give them a call. When the activity is above a certain level – showing that they are extremely engaged, give them acknowledgement (a plaque, thanks, a gift card, whatever).

At this point, I’m pretty much checking out of this conversation. Mark did a great job presenting the information so it’s no fault of his. He seems to really know his stuff and makes a convincing argument for it.

For me, it just seems so far away from the practical needs of my company and my customers and I can’t see how to apply it.

I agree that this is important stuff for the near-term future and even right now for a small constituency. Your mileage may vary.

(BTW – I think I’m checking out at the right time as he is starting to go into particulars that apply closely to Avectra and their target industries.)

Using Social Media to Generate Revenue (ITA Fall Collaborative 2011 Session)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/birgerking/4731898939/sizes/z/in/photostream/From the session description:

Learn from a small, diversified, group of some of the industry’s most creative minds who have teamed together to create an innovative approach to generating leads and customers through Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube and Twitter.

This session was a panel of Apryl Hanson (BlytheCo) and Wayne Schulz (Schulz Consulting) led by B.J. O’Reilly (ISM). I’m not 100% certain how the description fits the panel but I know Wayne knows more about social media than most others in the channel and, because of BlytheCo’s sheer size if no other reason, Apryl certainly will have a good amount of experiences to share.

We started as Apryl talked about BlytheCo’s different social media products, their magainze and blog. Their second largest search term is their name (interesting – the Blytheco brand must be significant).

Their lead volume is about 5% of all traffic with monthly volume ranging from 20,000 to 60,000 visitors per month depending on the month (I would imagine year end gets heavier traffic). It wasn’t specified if this was uniques, pagecounts, total or exactly what it was.

She stated that lead quality is about 50% which means 1 out of 2 leads go from raw to qualified. This seems to be 50% of the 5% – not 50% of the total visitor count.

Wayne went on to discuss the importance of trying to determine *who* is making the inquiries because there is a big difference between someone just looking for a quick answer vs someone looking for long-term help. Further clarifying this point, Wayne underlined the importance of quickly and effectively filtering these folks to determine who will be serious customers that fit his particular model and ideal customer.

He also discussed the importance of getting people to sign up for newsletters as these people are usually quicker to make a decision and become a customer as opposed to the general, one-time inquiry which oftentimes is a price shopper that is already in discussion with other resellers.

As part of the filtering and qualification process, Wayne is a firm believer in providing starts as pricing to help people self-qualify and determine if they are a good fit from a financial perspective for Schulz Consulting. Wayne has created a fairly high volume of leads and has decidedly kept his firm smaller so it makes sense that he has established a solid methodology to move people along or out.

Wayne commented further about the importance of driving people to sign up for newsletters as this creates a stronger relationship with a higher value over time. Again, he stresses the importance of establishing this connection simply by using inexpensive, easy to use tools such as MailChimp.

He commented about being personal and connecting with people through images and stories. Apryl shared that one of their best hit posts was the one where she discussed shoes and conferences. To me, that makes sense since it’s a human thing – we can all relate so it creates a real connection with most of us.

There was consensus among the panel (and heads were nodding in the room) that the content that you put out there should be valuable, useful and informative. People will only stomach so many articles about how great your company is.

And if you do write those pieces, try your best to make it about your customers and their needs. (Here’s my attempt – it’s a work in process, let me know what you think.)

Wayne recommends borrowing ideas liberally from other industries because most businesses (he stated “resellers” but every industry develops tunnel vision) are comfortable repeating marketing tactics that worked in the 1980′s.

Apryl shared a slide of where BlytheCo’s volume comes from:

  • Organic Search 58%
  • Referrals 5%
  • Paid Search 8%
  • Direct Traffic 25%
  • E-mail Marketing 1%
  • Social Media 1%

What do these numbers tell us? Well … it’s great real-world confirmation that content is king since organic search is primarily driven by content, key words, information that you put out there.

Apryl discussed the importance of creating and tracking landing pages to determine what’s working and what’s not. From my perspective, this is so far beyond where I currently am that it’s hard to imagine this level of sophistication but it’s something that all the larger businesses seem to believe in strongly.

Again, landing pages should be defined around what customers are searching for as opposed to product features. Ex. How do I close my GL would be a common search term.

The discussion shifted to the concept that ideas make the social media team and it’s important to educate your team, your clients and even your prospect on connecting with you on the different social networks. This is easier said than done.

I’m not sure about you but most of my clients don’t see the value of social networking yet. Search engines … yes. Facebook … maybe. LinkedIn … somewhat. Twitter … not at all really.

I’m sure adoption will grow over time at an increasing rate. For now, it’s a tough sell.

The panel discussed using the right tools – such as Hubspot, SalesFusion, HootSuite, TweetDeck, Google Reader, Google Alerts and others. The tools make it easier to create, manage and track your social media efforts.

Watching my word count, I see that I’m around 850 and I’m always conscious of over-staying my welcome. Hopefully the information above will prove to be useful in your marketing efforts.

For me, the session was another valuable presentation here at the ITA. Special thanks to Apryl Hanson and Wayne Schulz for so freely sharing information. For any resellers, I strongly recommend that you subscribe to Wayne’s blog at www.erplife.com where he shares this type of information routinely.

Thanks also to B.J. O’Reilly for keeping the panel moving so well. Out of the various panel sessions I’ve attended over the last few days, he’s done the best job at balancing the conversation and including the audience.

Overall – this was a great, informative session.

Get out of IT while you can (ITA Fall Collaborative Mon morning keynote)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/markhillary/2212546989/sizes/z/in/photostream/What a change a day makes. The “Shift Age” keynote from last night left me a bit cold but this morning’s presentation by Craig Schiefelbein on “Get Out of IT While You Can” was interesting and a worthwhile investment of time.

Most of the points covered during the keynote can be found at a high-level here.

There’s a common expresssion that goes “you’re preaching to the choir”. Well – sometimes the choir needs preaching to and, oftentimes, the choir is the most receptive to the message.

We might have that case here with Mr. Schiefelbein’s presentation. His entire message resonated with me – he’s preaching to the choir. Here’s some nuggets:

  • You don’t need to invent to innovate.  People that read my posts regularly know that Peter Drucker has a go to quote for me that spells out businesses have two purposes: innovation and marketing. Craig’s point is on the money – you don’t need to invent the next iPad to innovate with existing products and services to create value.
  • Play to win vs. play not to lose.  When you play not to lose, you are looking at cost containment, efficiency, risk mitigation, etc. This leads to pursuing the holy grail of efficiency which leads to fragility and extreme leanness. This makes it difficult to innovate and that’s a business killer in today’s climate.
  • IT cannot be successful as a cost center.  This draws somewhat from the Tom Peters school of thought and underscores Craig’s entire presentation. Stop considering yourself as the IT guys – figure out how to drive value, innovate, wow your company’s customers. That’s what it takes to succeed in today’s rapidly moving world.

All in all, this was a great presentation and drove home some very important points for anyone with an IT department or providing IT services.

Don’t take my word for it. Grab a copy of the book and draw your own conclusions.

Is the “Shift Age” upon us? (ITA Fall Collaborative 2011 Keynote)

Shhhh! The futurist is at work

To kick-off the ITA Fall Collaborative, author and self-appointed “futurist”, David Houle, gave a presentation detailing his thoughts on where we are as a society, how we got here and where we need to go in the future.

I will say up-front that the talk left me a bit cold.

I can’t put my finger on why exactly but it could have been the delivery, the difficult to read powerpoints, the time of day (it was a long day) but I think the bottom line was the message.

I just didn’t buy into a lot of the information being presented. Some of this is my personal biases and skepticism towards imposed patterns.

Now, don’t get me wrong, there were some nuggets of truth sprinkled in there but a lot of it seemed like Monday morning quarterbacking – where Mr. Houle imposed patterns on history to draw conclusions and organize thoughts to make predictions.

Ok … so maybe that’s what a “futurist” does.

Personally I am the type of guy who needs more concrete facts and evidence instead of a couple of powerpoint slides. In all fairness, he might have access to this information and it is simply impossible to present it all in a one hour long presentation.

Even if we go along with this thought and make allowances for the difficulty that all “futurists” have in coallescing their thoughts into a concise and convincing presentation, the patterns that he overlaid on historical events and the conclusions that he draws don’t jibe with me on several levels.

His main thrust is that we have entered into a new age – which he has coined as the “Shift Age”. During this Age, we will experience many needs to survive as a business. (He outlines them in his book.)

Well … personally I don’t believe.

I think we are still in the Information Age (which he contends started in the 1970s and ended a few years back to usher in the Shift Age) and the reason for the current upheaval is not because we have entered a new Age but rather the disruption presented by the Internet.

To me, it seems that the Internet is a tool that is accelerating the Information Age – much like advances during the Industrial Age accelerated those periods (think the steam engine, the assembly line, etc.).

There were other points and conclusions that he has drawn that I disagree with but when you disagree with the core argument – the very existence of the proposed Shift Age – there is no need to break down the conclusions derived from the theory.

It’s like arguing how fast the sun moves around the Earth. It just doesn’t work that way.

This is just my opinion. Mr. Houle has obviously been very successful as a “futurist”, selling his theory and management speaking engagements, so what do I know? I can see how it appeals to some to have patterns on things and give a decisive direction for the future.

Who doesn’t want that? I encourage everyone to read his book yourself and draw your own conclusions. Report back here.

(Yes – some might say that “futurist” doesn’t need quotes around it just like “psychic advisor” doesn’t need quotes around it.)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 39 other followers